TANVI
Marketing Strategy · Data & AI · Brand Growth
Strategy & Growth
A tech-marketing strategist who reads a dataset and a room with the same instinct.
I'm Tanvi. I grew up in Pune, the Oxford of the East, and now work out of Boston, the Athens of America. Apparently I have a type.
I work at the intersection of data, marketing, and AI. Right now that's a Business Development Manager role: growth and partnerships across the entire US, fifteen West Coast states of my own, and everything that comes with that, from marketing and content to analysis, sales, and AI-visibility strategy. Before this, my path ran through international sports, life sciences, and a startup I helped build from zero to profit, plus a STEM Master's in Marketing.
What I have gained has been unusually broad. Before I came to Boston I ran an entire commercial function, with a team of eight alongside me, across three residential and commercial projects, running the full marketing and sales engine.
None of it was a detour. What connects it all is how I think: understand the system first, find where the real leverage is, then execute. That thread runs through every page here.
Where to start
Pick a thread.
Who I Am
The long version
of a short answer.
Most marketing people haven't won international medals in Taekwondo, run clinical research in a hospital, produced a documentary, and closed $3M in real estate sales before specializing in AI. I have, and the order matters. Each one handed me something the next one turned out to need.
Sports came first, at five, and never really left, and it gave me the operating system I still run on: stay composed when things go wrong, recover fast, and show up long before the results do.
Science came next. A Microbiology focus taught me to think in systems and trust evidence over noise. Then came years of deliberate range: UN-recognized NGO leadership, event management, theatre, interpretation. Different rooms, different languages, one constant, which was paying attention to how people actually make decisions.
It points somewhere specific now. Marketing that starts with evidence and ends with an idea worth acting on. The eight chapters below are how it got there.
Strategy & Growth
Data & AI
Tools & Platforms
Human Skills & Languages
The Timeline
Every chapter
was a choice.
A non-linear path, built on purpose. Each step added a different lens, and they all point in the same direction.
How I Think
Different fields,
one operating system.
The skills get you in the room. How you think decides what happens in it.
Academic & Research Projects
Real data.
Real names.
Surveys capture what people are willing to say about a product. Eye tracking and skin conductance capture what happened before they decided what to say.
Three sections. Pick one to open it.
Before the boardroom,
there was the mat.
I started playing at five, and I haven't stopped since. Long before any boardroom or dataset, sports taught me how to perform under pressure, recover from a loss, and outwork the room. It's the foundation everything else is built on, and it's still how I operate.
Sports isn't a line on my résumé. It's the source code.
The composure to present to a room full of executives, the discipline to learn a new domain from scratch, the instinct to read a situation before the first move: all of it traces back here.
The experiences that
built the perspective.
Most of these ran alongside my studies. They don't fit on a one-page résumé, but they're a real part of why I see problems the way I do, and why I'm comfortable across so many kinds of rooms.
Four pieces of work where I owned the outcome. Each one is a system I built and left running.
Credentials
Where the rigor
came from.
A through-line from life sciences to marketing science, each stage adding a layer of how I analyze, test, and decide.
Certifications
Degrees & Diplomas
Coursework: Neuromarketing, Machine Learning for Marketing (Python), Advanced Digital Analytics (SAS), Advanced Marketing Analytics (R), Qualitative Research, Customer Centricity, Global Perspectives for Consumers.
AI & Strategy
Fluent in AI.
Grounded in strategy.
Everyone claims to use AI now. Here is what I have actually produced with it, and where I recorded that it could not be trusted.
Three of the four engines I designed for could not be measured anonymously any more. That turned out to be the first finding.
"How do I start strength training if I have never lifted before" returned technique advice and named nobody. So did the questions about weekly exercise and about cardio against weights. The assistant answered like a coach rather than a shop.
That reverses the usual AEO assumption. Top-of-funnel is where most brands compete hardest, and it is exactly where the assistant names no one.
An empty leader slot is an opportunity finding rather than a neutral one. The cost of taking share is currently low. Windows like that close.
One review site is doing a disproportionate share of the deciding, which means a strategy aimed at your own website is optimising the wrong asset.
The assistant gives these the same visual authority as an independent review. A buyer sees a citation and reads it as verification. Roughly a third of the time it is the seller's own marketing.
Future led on both engines here, and led on two different engines four weeks earlier. Getting into an answer is a per-engine fight. Owning the top slot looks like a position that transfers.
If a brand cannot clear the third-party threshold, owned-content work has nothing to amplify.
Most published AEO numbers do not disclose their sample size, which should tell you something.
Python, scikit-learn
was prompt quality
instrument
I found the gap before anyone asked me to look
Buyers now ask AI assistants what to buy instead of typing into a search box. Organisations that do not appear in those answers lose ground quietly, because nothing in their analytics tells them it is happening.
I spotted that exposure inside a B2B organization I work with and built an AI Engine Optimization strategy to close it, carrying it from research through to an implementation plan. Nobody briefed me on it.
AI rollouts rarely fail on the product
Teams rarely fail at AI because they picked the wrong tool. They fail because nobody designed the workflow around it, so it gets used enthusiastically for a fortnight and then quietly abandoned. The work that decides it is unglamorous: finding where the tool genuinely removes friction, shaping the habit around it, and going back a month later to check whether it held.
Knowing the technology is the easy part. Getting a team to work differently because of it is the harder skill.
The Arc
An early adopter, deliberately.
I didn't arrive at AI when it became unavoidable. I started early, learned to use it responsibly, and grew into leading strategy on it.
Tools I actually use
What I have actually built with each one.
Let's Connect
Let's build
something real.
I'm always up for a good conversation about growth, AI, or where marketing is heading next. A role, a collaboration, or just comparing notes, all of it works.